Friday, February 10, 2012

Designing power delivery when and where you need it

File:Wenatchee WA 2009.jpg
Wenatchee, Washington


Douglas PUD plans new transmission line


Friday, February 10, 2012
EAST WENATCHEE — The Douglas County PUD will begin work this summer on a new 230 kilovolt transmission line needed to more reliably keep the lights on as the city grows.
PUD spokeswoman Meaghan Vibbert said the $13 million line will stretch 13 miles from the utility’s Douglas Switchyard near Rocky Reach Dam up and across Badger Mountain and down to its Rapids Switchyard in Rock Island. Work should be finished in the summer of 2013.
The line will follow an established “transmission corridor” that already includes high-voltage lines owned by the Bonneville Power Administration, the Chelan County PUD and Puget Sound Energy.
Despite the new line’s origin near Rocky Reach Dam, the Douglas Substation connects to and carries electricity generated at the Douglas PUD’s Wells Dam, near Pateros on the Columbia River, Vibbert said.
The new line is necessary to bolster East Wenatchee’s existing delivery system, which studies have shown is vulnerable to overloads in some neighborhoods under certain conditions — a problem expected to worsen as the city grows.
The new line will bring the system up to federal energy reliability standards and reduce the likelihood of stress-caused outages or drops in voltage, known as “brown outs,” which cause lights to dim, according to information provided by Vibbert.
Commonwealth Associates Inc. of Mount Vernon is designing the project, which will be built on single, steel poles. A construction contract will be advertised and awarded in the coming weeks.
The new line is considered a large project for the PUD. Vibbert said that its estimated $13 million price tag is larger than the typical annual capital budget for the utility’s electric distribution system.

Christine Pratt: 665-1173
pratt@wenatcheeworld.com

http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2012/feb/10/douglas-pud-plans-new-transmission-line/

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Business Unit News - Power Generation & Energy Group





Barnes to lead veteran team as Commonwealth 
expands power generation services


JACKSON, MI – Commonwealth Associates, Inc. is pleased to announce that Samuel R. Barnes, P.E. has joined the company as Vice President of the Power Generation & Energy Group.  “With over 21 years’ experience in the design, installation, and project management of power generation projects, Sam is a tremendous asset to our team,” stated Commonwealth President, Dennis F. DeCosta, P.E. 

Barnes is a registered professional mechanical engineer in the state of Michigan and received his B.S. from the University of Michigan.  Prior to joining Commonwealth, he served as Vice President and Director of Engineering at HDR Engineering/Cummins & Barnard, Inc., in Ann Arbor.  DeCosta continued, “Sam brings the level of expertise in power generation that our clients have come to trust and expect from us in our other service areas, most notably our transmission and distribution work.  He was the obvious choice to lead our expansion in this area.”  “Commonwealth is an exceptional organization known in the industry for its technical excellence, strong client relationships, and professional integrity.  I am pleased to be able to serve in this new capacity and to build a best-in-class group for our clients,” commented Barnes.  Senior Consultant Steven P. Yambor, P.E., widely considered a veteran in the power generation industry, stated, “Personally, I saw the vision, knew the potential, and, having previously worked with Sam, knew this was where I wanted to be.”

Mr. Barnes can be reached at sam.barnes@cai-engr.com or by telephone at 517-817-1616.


Commonwealth offers a complete package of engineering and consulting services for clients and is proud to be listed among the 2011 Top 40 Design Firms by EC&M Magazine and the 2011 Top 500 Design Firms by ENR.com.  The company maintains principal offices in Mount Vernon, Washington; Atlanta, Georgia; and Jackson, Michigan, along with satellites in Columbus and Dayton, Ohio and Roanoke, Virginia.

For more information:, please visit: www.cai-engr.com.
On Facebook at: www.facebook.com/commonwealthassociates
On Twitter at: www.twitter.com/caiengr_dot_com

# # #

Friday, February 3, 2012

Coal ash pond closing? What now? Find out in Baltimore!


ELECTRIC POWER 2012, which will be held this year from May 15-17, in Baltimore, Maryland, is the largest coal power conference in the U.S.  Commonwealth's own Sam Barnes Vice President of Power Generation & Energy, will be a featured speaker.  Don't miss it!  See details below.... 



EP12 Session 8B Water & Wastewater Issues
Wednesday, May 16
8:00 - 9:30 AM
Rm 328

This session explores current and anticipated solutions to environmental challenges associated with power plant wastewater, including case studies covering ash pond water and wet FGD blowdown treatment.  


Session Sub-Topics:
  • Wet FGD Blowdown Treatment
  • Coal Ash Pond Water Treatment
  • Wastewater Characterizations

Chair:
Dr. Jerry Pell, Environmental Scientist. Project Manager; Office of Electricity (OE), U.S. Department of Energy
Co-Chair:
Ira Brodsky, AQCS Specialist, URS Corporation
Speaker(s):My Coal Ash Pond Will Be Closed - What Do I Do With the Wastewater?
Sam Barnes, Vice President - Power Generation and Energy, Commonwealth Associates, Inc.
Passive Treatment of Coal Ash Leachate
Eric McCleary, Restoration Ecologist, Greenhorne & O'Mara Inc.
The Current and Future Use of Deep Injection Well Technology in the Power Generation Industry
Edward McCullers, GM Deep Well Operations, Layne Christensen Company
Co-Author(s):
David McNabb, CEO, McNabb Hydrogeologic Consulting, Inc.
Mark McNeal, CEO, ASRus, LLC
Chemistry Data Collection for Statistical Analysis
Matthew Heermann, Sargent & Lundy LLC
-----

Speaker Bio

Sam Barnes is Vice President - Power Generation and Energy, Commonwealth Associates, Inc. He has 21 years of experience in the power industry. As a mechanical engineer and a project manager Sam has been involved in design, consulting and development of coal and gas fired plants. He graduated from the University of Michigan with a BSME and is a trustee on the board of Jackson Community College.

Best Practice Story:  Whether or not coal ash becomes classified as hazardous waste, coal plant owners may be looking at converting their ash systems from wet to dry for any number of reasons. But what does this do to the plant's water mass balance and where will the process wastewater go? There are some steps that should be followed so that all effects are taken into consideration. First, start by characterizing the plant's wastewater flows for both quantity and quality. Future considerations that could add or take away from wastewater generation must be documented. Once a clear picture of the amount and nature of wastewater is known, modifications can be reviewed that will minimize the amount of wastewater generated. Modifications may include both physical changes and operational changes. Once wastewater generation has been minimized, treatment before release to an outfall must be considered. The final step is evaluation of appropriate treatment options and choosing the one that balances compliance, project cost and operating and maintenance costs. This paper will also address upcoming regulatory issues that will likely decide the extent of treatment necessary. The most likely treatment scenarios will also be addressed.



-----

Thursday, February 2, 2012

The Groundhog Has Spoken


You might not be aware that groundhog hairs are used for tying trout flies, such as the 'Chuck Caddis, or that early American Indians once used sturdy woodchuck hides for the soles of moccasins, but I bet you're aware that Phil saw his shadow again and it's six more weeks of winter!  That's why, about this time, you might want to consider a terrific Commonwealth job in our Atlanta office.  To find out what's available, click here.


Once you've done that, you might want to discover the other interesting facts about groundhogs you might not know:  http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/96/2.1.96/facts.html

Stay warm!
-------

Monday, January 30, 2012

[PAPER] MISO MVPs: A Hidden Opportunity for Michigan's Rate Payers and Economy

Editors' Note: Commonwealth's Transmission Mapping Solution was used by Mr. Miller to acquire the information needed to create the map that is the central figure in the presentation.  For more information about   Transmission Mapping for Network Analysis, please click here or view the product list.


Overview
Despite FERC’s ruling to the contrary[1], the conventional wisdom in Michigan is that MISO’s Multi-Value Projects (MVP) scheme for paying for transmission projects is a financial loser for Michigan.

See for example:


Because Michigan is composed of two peninsulas, the thinking is that there isn’t any reason that MVP’s will be built in Michigan.  While this thinking maybe right, let’s examine a concept that might turn this equation on its head.  Before we do, let’s review some of the conditions that create the opportunity for the concept.

Background
For background, here are some key issues:

Geography: While Michigan is composed of peninsulas, we are not Florida.  The Detroit and St. Clair rivers are not the Atlantic Ocean and the Sault River is not the North Sea.  The Straits of Mackinac are negotiable and even Lake Michigan isn’t the Caribbean.

Connection with the regional Independent System Operator MISO: With the shift of members to PJM, Michigan no longer has any significant direct ties with other MISO members.  It might only be a matter of time before Lower Peninsula Michigan entities join the crowd and join PJM without a game changer to reinvigorate the relationship.



MISO Market Area[2]



MISO Reliability Coordination Area[3]

Potential Resources: Michigan has vast amounts of potential renewable energy, mostly wind.  Using the highly successful Ludington Pump Storage plant as an example, Michigan’s lakeshore has the potential for cheap energy storage with proven technology.  If Michigan becomes a hotbed of battery activity, the experience with storage could morph easily into other forms of storage.  Michigan has some natural gas and gas storage and good connections to the natural gas pipeline network making modern natural gas fired generators attractive.  Although some will certainly disagree about the merits of nuclear power, Michigan is seismically stable, free of hurricanes and typhoons, and there has never been a tsunami on Lake Huron. While some may argue that the proximity to its vast fresh water resources is a risk for nuclear power, this risk seems manageable absent the probability of a catastrophic geological event.  Finally, Michigan is in close proximity to Canada and its vast resources of hydro power and, to a lesser extent, natural gas and oil.

Power Supply Challenges: The coal generation in Michigan is old.  Those plants that are not killed by new environmental regulations risk simply dying a natural death from old age.  Michigan’s fate could be worse if this and other aging generation is kept alive by enormous investments in environmental controls and maintaining electric reliability requires Michigan to be at the terminus of massive MVP transmission projects through Illinois, Indiana, and beyond.

Electric Reliability: While efforts are being made to insure bulk power electric reliability, the reality is that these efforts have not yet resulted in infrastructure improvements in the form of transmission improvements that substantially change the structure.  Consequently, the next Northeast blackout is going to look pretty much like the last two with system separation occurring somewhere in Michigan, east in Ontario, or east along lines through Ohio, Pennsylvania, and western New York.  Provided AEP’s network of 765 kV lines does not become overloaded with power flowing from “PJM West” to the original parts of PJM and NYISO, the cascading blackout will stop north of this 765 kV back bone.

Concept
With these facts held in mind, our concept is that Michigan should be a Mecca for major transmission projects with the MVP designation.  Specifically, these projects would be major transmission lines crossing the Upper Peninsula and major transmission lines, similar to the 765 kV projects that ITC once proposed, built between Chicago and Detroit.  


The proposed MVP in the Lower Peninsula would originate at the 765 kV Dumont substation or at the Cook Power plant that is served by a radial extension of the 765 kV network.  Following mostly existing right-of-ways, it would go north to Kenowa (or Vegennes) and turn east to pass Thetford and end at Scott (Lambton).  A segment south from Thetford to Marysville or South Canton might also be added.

On the west, extensions to Collins or Plano could be added to meet up with new transmission supporting renewable generation in the Northern Plains.  On the east, extension to Longwood would add a tie to the Canadian 500 kV system.

The proposed MVP in the Upper Peninsula would consist of segments from western Wisconsin (or Minnesota) to Sault Saint Marie, from Arnold to Saint Ignace, from Saint Ignace to Sault Saint Marie, and from Saint Ignace and the Straights to Livingston.  Construction of this could be at 345 kV, 500 kV, 765 kV, direct current.  The project in the east could be extended to the Hamner substation to tie into the Canadian 500 kV.  The key idea is to build massive transmission to take renewable energy generation from Minnesota and the Dakotas and ship it to the Midwest and beyond.  The path from these regions and the Midwest and New York and beyond is shorter than the path around the south end of Lake Michigan and it avoids the heavy congestion around the south end of Lake Michigan.

Perhaps the most radical feature of this connection is a new, international connection at the Sault, where no substantial connection currently exists.  Controlling the flows in a precisely regulated way may be desirable and necessary at the connection points to Canada. To do so requires modern back-to-back converters like the one currently being installed in New Jersey to service a new connection to New York.

Here are some rough estimates of segment lengths that are probably biased on the low side because they may not include enough length to account for routing compromises.

Segment
Length (miles)
Stone Lake – Hanmer
543
9 Mile – St Ignace
40
Gardner Park – St. Ignace
274
St. Ignace – Livingston
58
Dumont – Thetford
223
Thetford - Lambton
90
Lambton –Longwood
45
Thetford – South Canton
257
Total
1,530

Concept Benefits
While no thorough study of all the elements of this concept have been made, aside from directing more MVPs to Michigan, it has some immediate, obvious potential benefits, in that it:

  • Provides a transmission backbone to import and export power into and through Michigan. Ideally this would help lead to a self-sufficient Michigan and perhaps increase the likelihood that Michigan might become a net generation exporter, both to the west to Chicago and to the east to NYISO and PJM.  Ties to Canada would allow better resource management with opportunities for optimizing the use of Canadian hydro versus renewable energy resources in Michigan.  The concept provides an alternative path and exploits existing transmission resource for renewable electric generation originating from the Upper Midwest to New York and PJM.  This concept should be advantageous compared to alternatives because it avoids both transmission congestion and corridor congestion south of Lake Michigan.
  • Increases the regional system reliability. The plan addresses local reliability problems associated with importing power into southwest Michigan and local problems in the Upper Peninsula.  It also has the potential for addressing super regional problems such as the loop flows around Lake Erie and underlying problems that would reduce the probability of another “northeast” blackout.
  • The concept restores physical ties and strengthens virtual ties to MISO.  This should have a variety of advantages, including making operations easier and reducing or eliminating difficulties associated with constructing a reasonable market, including impacts on LMP calculations.  If Michigan eventually goes to PJM, the infrastructure will retain or have enhanced value.


Michigan Support for the Concept
Provided this concept has merit, other than promoting the idea so that it is studied and understood, the concept of building MVP transmission in Michigan should stand on its own when compared to other methods of addressing the regions transmission needs.  That said, here some thoughts on how Michigan can enhance the chances of obtaining MISO MVPs.

  • Create a regulatory climate that removes barriers to long linear projects while protecting the legitimate interests of stakeholders.  Uniform statewide rules with respect to acquiring right-of-way are important.  The State could review its land holdings to see if any are appropriate for this activity.  Michigan already has a leg up, because its transmission is owned by strongly-favored independent transmission owners.  While both are unique, either is, or would be, a great proponent of these projects.
  • Exercise Michigan’s long standing skills as a border state and its knowledge of international projects with Canada.  Canadian “buy in” would go a long way to add value to these projects.  This is not trivial, because the relationship between MISO and the Ontario Independent System operator is not robust, at least not in the planning activity.
  • Generation drives transmission, so Michigan should make it as easy as reasonably possible to build wind, natural gas, and pumped storage generation.  Michigan is a net importer of electric energy and fuel to produce the electric energy that is generated in Michigan.  Although it is not an issue for wind-generated energy, water is often a key component of thermal generation projects.  We should be sure that Michigan’s advantage is not negated by national rules that are appropriate for water usage from sources such as the Colorado River and regions like the Southwest, but irrelevant to the water conditions in Michigan.  Provided the generation is economically competitive in Michigan and for export, Michigan’s economy would be greatly enhanced by being self-sufficient, or even a net provider of electric power.
  • Continue to look for opportunities to create new storage technologies, particularly those associated with the automotive industry.  Michigan needs to be smart and shouldn’t chase technology for technology’s sake, but if the economic case can be made, the link should be exploited. For example, because battery packs have useful life after they are no longer useful in an automotive application, their remaining capabilities might be exploited in fixed plants providing storage for the grid.  This could result in a valuable link in the economic and environmental life cycle of automotive battery packs.
In conclusion, MISO MVPs may be bad policy for Michigan, but we have outlined a concept that can and should be explored that would result in MVP dollars being spent in Michigan on alternatives that are potentially superior to those proposed or that are in the planning stages.

©2012 Commonwealth Associates, Inc. and Stephen S. Miller, P.E.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

MISO MVPs and Michigan: Bad policy or hidden opportunity?




In an October 21st posting, we addressed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) ruling on the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.'s (MISO) multi-value projects (MVPs) cost allocation scheme and the strong response to it in Michigan, a state in which it is being questioned whether or not the costs will actually be in line with the benefits received (see http://commonwealthassociates.blogspot.com/2011/10/federal-energy-regulatory-commission.html).

Stephen S. Miller, P.E.
Commonwealth's Stephen S. Miller, P.E., Section Manager for TRANSMISSION 2000®, will be offering an interesting take on the situation tomorrow, Friday, January 27th, as one of the featured speakers at the Michigan Forum on Economic Regulatory Policy put on by Michigan State University's Institute of Public Utilities at the Kellogg Center in East Lansing.  He will be taking a look at Michigan's unique geography, the connection with the regional Independent System Operator, potential resources, power supply challenges, electric reliability, international relations, and new technologies, particularly those associated with the automotive industry.

Miller has more than 33 years of experience in the analysis and planning of electric utility systems and the design and development of associated software programs, particularly the TRANSMISSION 2000® series of programs -- including Power Flow, Short Circuit, and Transient Stability -- designed to improve the analysis and planning of utility transmission systems.


A copy of his presentation will be posted here.

-----

Friday, January 6, 2012

Coming to Life Beneath the Hudson

                       Photo by Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Like proud parents watching their child walk for a diploma, one of Commonwealth's goals for our conceptual plans and project evaluations is to see them written in steel and concrete.  However, for a variety of reasons, planning studies frequently result in long-forgotten reports buried on a shelf or an electronic drive somewhere.  We are proud to provide our clients with the experience, talent, and unique combination of resources that turn concepts into projects -- projects like the one, years in the planning, now coming to life beneath the Hudson River between Midtown Manhattan and New Jersey in New York Harbor.

In 2006, Commonwealth assisted the New York Power Authority (NYPA) with evaluating power supply options for New York City.  Shortly after providing advice in the form of study conclusions and work papers, NYPA selected the project we recommended.  This New York Times article highlights the progress toward implementation of that project.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/27/nyregion/crew-lays-power-cable-beneath-the-hudson.html?_r=1

http://www.projectfinancemagazine.com/Article/2413302/Sectors-Power/NYPA-picks-New-York-City-suppliers.html

-----

Friday, December 30, 2011

Do you have a plan for Storm Water Pollution Prevention?


PROTECTING our environment, especially streams and wetlands, is a responsibility that Commonwealth and our clients take seriously.  During the design development phase of our energy projects, Commonwealth’s environmental staff are working with the utility engineers, right-of-way personnel, and contractors to plan for soil erosion control and to minimize the impacts caused by construction, including off road access and installation of structures.

On developing land, erosion frequently presents in the form of gully erosion on land disturbed for a year or less.  Gully erosion, the result of concentrated flows of surface runoff, generates high sediment volumes requiring costly clean-up and the continual need for site stabilization during development.  A construction site typically erodes at a rate of 50 tons/acre/year.  This erosion rate is 5 times greater than cropland erosion, and 250 times greater than woodland erosion. These land changes are the source of much of the sediment that pollutes our streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and reservoirs.

In 1972, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, PL 92-500 and Amendments, were passed.  Section 208 of PL 92-500 required that area-wide plans be prepared to control pollution from all sources, including urban-industrial areas.  The goal of PL 92-500 was to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation’s waterways.”  In 1992, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandated that states, that had been given the authority to administer provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. Section 466 et seq.) and issue National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, make provisions for the regulation of discharges of stormwater and dewatering waste waters from construction activities.

Commonwealth has been expanding our services in providing Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) for transmission line construction projects.  On route map drawings, we are incorporating access routes and storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) measures per U.S. EPA and State standards.  These plans include a narrative, location, and details of the controls.  For transmission projects, this includes: drainage patterns and final slopes (in most cases the existing and final will be the same); areas of soil disturbance; location and details of controls to be used on the site; best management practices (BMPs); and the method for stabilization of disturbed areas, both temporary and permanent.  BMPs include such things as: vegetative buffers, tracking surfaces, check dams, silt fence, temporary fords, treatment and release for dewatering, and site restoration and stabilization.  The intent of these drawings is to show how sediment will be kept out of the streams and wetlands; prevent any off-site accumulations, including tracking onto public roads; and restore the site once construction is complete. 


GENERAL


Soil erosion involves the wearing away of the surface of the land by the action of wind, water, ice, and gravity.  Once worn away, the detached soil particles are transported and ultimately deposited, resulting in sedimentation.  Geologic or "natural" erosion and sedimentation occur over long periods of geologic time, resulting in the wearing away of highlands and the building up of lowlands.  In general, natural erosion and sedimentation occur at a very slow rate.  Erosion and sedimentation become a problem when they are accelerated beyond natural rates.  Accelerated erosion is primarily the result of the influence of human activities on the environment.  Once exposed, unprotected soil is subject to rapid erosion by the action of wind, water, ice or gravity.  In many parts of the US, sediment produced by uncontrolled erosion is the greatest pollutant by volume impacting our lakes, streams, and wetlands.  Everyone in these areas is affected by erosion and off-site sedimentation.  Erosion and sedimentation result in: loss of fertile topsoil, filling of lakes and streams, increased flooding, damage to plant and animal life, and structural damage to buildings and roads.

One period of higher erosion potential exists during the spring thaw.  It is a time when the coastal storm track increases rainfall potential.  Additionally, because the ground is still partially frozen, the absorptive capacity is reduced.  While frozen soils are relatively erosion resistant, they melt from the top down, creating a soft erodible surface over a hard impervious sub-surface.  In northern climates, thawing of the soils often occurs in conjunction with the early spring rains combined with snow melt.  Additionally, soils with high moisture content are subject to frost heaving and can be very easily eroded upon thawing.  Wind and water are the main agents of soil erosion.  The amount of soil they can carry away is influenced by two related factors:

1.      Speed - the faster either moves, the more soil it can erode; and

2.    Cover - mulch, organic litter, plants, and hardscape protect the soil and, in their absence, wind and water can do much more damage.  Vegetative cover plays an important role in controlling erosion by protecting soil surface from the impact of falling rain, holding soil particles in place, enhancing the soil’s capacity to absorb water, slowing the velocity of runoff, removing subsurface water between rain falls through the process of evapo-transporation, and improving infiltration rates.

By limiting and/or staging the removal of existing vegetation, and by decreasing the area and duration of exposure, soil erosion and sedimentation can be significantly reduced.  Give special consideration to the maintenance of existing vegetative cover on areas of high erosion potential such as erodible soils, steep slopes, ditches, and the banks of streams.

The contribution of water pollutants from your property may be small; however, when hundreds of small inputs are added together or aimed at sensitive areas, the impact is significant.  There are a number of things that homeowners can do that are simple and, in the end, will be very cost effective:

1.      Become familiar with the natural drainage patterns of your property.  Try not to alter them.  Proper site design will help you avoid costly erosion control measures.

2.      Contact your town, county, or state offices to find out whether permits will be needed from them and, if so, secure any necessary permits and applications.

3.      Plan to preserve existing vegetation as much as possible.  Vegetation will naturally take up water, trap sediment, curb erosion, and improve the appearance and the value of your property.  Mark the trees and shrubs that you want to protect.  The root systems of grasses, shrubs, and trees help keep sloped surfaces in place.  Less erosion will occur on a vegetated hillside than on one without vegetation.  This is extremely important near water.  A vegetated buffer area can stabilize stream banks and be a last line of defense to absorb pollutants before they reach a river or lake.  An ideal buffer area is 25 to 50 feet of uncut grasses, shrubs and trees, but even a smaller strip can be beneficial.  Remember that heavy machinery must be kept well away from trees to avoid compacting their roots.

4.    For construction projects, discuss all aspects of the job with your contractor, including what erosion control measures will be used, such as installing silt fence on the down slope sides of exposed soil or around soil stock piles.  This is very important because there are laws concerning non-point source pollution and sediment is considered a non-point source pollutant.

5.      Locate soil piles away from any roads or waterways.

6.      Plan earth disturbing activities early in the year so that you can re-vegetate the site before the end of the growing season.  Grass and vegetation help curb erosion.  Plan to mulch disturbed sites if construction is delayed past the growing season.  This will protect bare soil during the winter and from spring runoff.

7.      Use temporary seed, such as an annual rye, to stabilize bare areas, including stockpiles, until removed or re-graded.  Mulch can also be used when temporary seeding is not feasible.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, etc!

y   i s s!  

H a p p y   H a n u k k a h!

  a!

Whatever you're celebrating, we wish you a delightful holiday!  We hope that, as you gather together with family and friends, you give and receive more joy than your hands and heart can hold.  To those traveling, we wish you safe travels.

We also want to let you know how very much we appreciate each one of our clients who allow us the privilege of working on your projects and becoming part of your circle of trust.  Our goal each day is to provide you with more reasons to Connect With Confidence.  It's not just a slogan to us.

If you want a chuckle, check out this bit about an engineer's take on Christmas: http://www.engineeringedu.com/Santa.html.  Who knows, perhaps it will save you time figuring it our for yourself...assuming you haven't already. ;)

Friday, December 16, 2011

Is your family at risk this Christmas?


You've seen the headlines...

Local family struggling to cope as fire destroys home.... 

It's devastating anytime, and especially at Christmas.  It doesn't have to happen.

We are proud to design ways to deliver power where it's needed most and we do so with safety in mind.  That's why, as we approach year's end with all its festivities and celebration, we want to take a brief minute to share some important reminders about holiday lighting that could save your life or the lives of those you love. 

Outdoor Lighting
  • Double check the lights for any frayed wires or cracks and be sure there is a light in each socket; damaged strands should be discarded.
  • If you decide to add more lights, don't use a ladder anywhere near overhead wires; be sure the ladder is securely placed on level ground. 
  • Lights should be approved by Underwriters Laboratory; "UL" will be clearly displayed on the tag.  And be sure the lights are approved for outdoor use.
  • Check to make sure tacks or nails were not hammered into the electrical cord during installation; most lights now have clips that can be used to attach to the house. 
  • Be sure heavy-duty, outdoor extension cords are being used.
  • If possible, outdoor lights and any inflatable decorations should be plugged into circuits protected by ground fault circuit interrupters.
  • Use a timer, or turn off the lights before going to bed.
Indoor Lighting
  • Continue to check lights for frayed wires or any other damage, particularly if there is a pet in the household.
  • Don't overload extension cords; no more than three sets of standard lights should be used per cord.
  • For special ornaments that plug into a bulb receptacle, use no more than two such ornaments per strand, or check the manufacturer's directions.
  • Lights should not touch drapes, furniture or carpeting.
  • Do not leave lights on overnight.
  • If you have children in your home, use safety caps on all electrical outlets
Safety tips courtesy of FirstEnergy via PR Newswire.

Friday, December 2, 2011

On Location: Roanoke, Virginia

This month, for those considering employment with Commonwealth, or simply wishing to learning more about us, we are featuring a series of posts showcasing our various office locations.  We are pleased to continue this week by introducing you to our Roanoke, Virginia office in America's picturesque Blue Ridge Mountains.  We trust you will find it, as we do, to be a wonderful place to live, work, and play.

Nicknamed "The Star City," Roanoke, Virginia is considered the cultural and business hub of the Blue Ridge Mountains.  It is the fourth largest city in the state and is home to many cultural attractions.  Roanoke's bustling city center is filled with lovely historic buildings, amazing upscale restaurants and great shops.  It's easy to spend a whole day just exploring the blocks of this amazing area.  You may wish to stop by the historic City Market to see the produce and wares grown and created by local producers, especially as Roanoke is located within the designated “North Fork of Roanoke” winemaking region. 
Love the outdoors?  Try hiking, biking, walking nature trails, fishing, and paddling in the cool, clear waters.  You’ll find an abundance of natural choices in Roanoke with 69 parks, 5 greenways, Carvin’s Cove, the nearby Blue Ridge Parkway, and Appalachian Trail.
The Roanoke Valley is conveniently located off of Interstate 81 and the Blue Ridge Parkway at the southern tip of the Shenandoah Valley.  Experience the railroad heritage, take in the arts and culture, shop, eat and enjoy the wealth of outdoor recreation in the heart of breathtaking mountains.  Surrounded by scenic beauty, the Roanoke region is a perfect place for Commonwealth employees to live and work. 

Soak in the breathtaking beauty of the Blue Ridge Mountains

Experience Roanoke's exciting nightlife

Follow your rising star to "The Star City"

Shop, dine, and explore in downtown Roanoke

Pretty as a picture!

Children of all ages enjoy the Shenandoah Valley's rich railroad heritage

Just a few of the highlights: